fbpx
Your source for the latest health, disability and Insurance news and tips

Oklahoma Options wants workers’ comp opt-out under ERISA

An Oklahoma workers’ compensation case is under review by the state’s Supreme Court. At issue is whether the Oklahoma Employee Injury Benefit Act is constitutional and enforceable.

In February, the Oklahoma Workers’ Compensation Commission ruled in Vasquez v. Dillards that “the benefit plans permitted to be used to opt-out establish a dual system under which injured workers are not treated equally.” The other part of the “dual system” is the Oklahoma Option’s Employee Benefit Plan, which was established under the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Any benefit plan must be equal to or better than what workers’ compensation provides.

Opponents to the opt-out plan believe that there does need to be improvements made to the workers’ compensation system, but they also believe the traditional status quo of the system needs to be preserved.

On the flip side, those who want another plan believe that employees will see a positive outcome and employers will see lower costs.

One supporter of the Oklahoma Option said that the plaintiff in the case — the injured worker — received substantial benefits until her claim was denied. He also said that the groups that are against workers’ comp alternatives are simply ignoring data that provide the positive outcomes that employees and employers have seen. “Changing the status quo in workers’ compensation is difficult. There’s a lot of resistance to the ideas of greater employer and employee, and medical provider accountability, and competition.”

The Workers’ Injury Law and Advocacy Group said opt-out plans, which are developed under ERISA guidelines, “are a wholly inadequate substitute for traditional workers’ compensation plans.” One reasons for this is because of the limitations ERISA-based plans have on the right to sue. However, even if the right to sue is included in ERISA plans, the WILG says the plans are still not adequate and “will inevitably shift the burden of liability from employers for employees’ injuries to state and federal programs.”

It will be interesting to see how the state Supreme Court rules on this topic in the coming months.

If you feel you have not been fairly represented by an ERISA filing, an attorney can provide you with better information and your options.

Source: Insurance Journal, “Opposing Sides File Briefs in Challenge to Oklahoma’s Work Comp Opt-Out,” Stephanie K. Jones, Aug. 30, 2016

Our Promise To Our Clients:

  • FREE: Consultations and Insurance Case Evaluations Are Always Free
  • UNDERSTANDING: We understand how you feel. Our clients are often at the very bottom of their life, feeling emotionally, physically, and financially exhausted.
  • PASSIONATE PEOPLE: Our expert Attorneys and Dedicated Staff Love The Work We Do. We are Compassionate, Caring, and Results Driven.
  • UNPARALLELED RESOURCES: We will not be bullied or outspent by billion-dollar insurance companies or their army of lawyers. 
  • RESPECTED: We have fought and won the respect of every disability and Long-term care insurance carrier for our policyholders.
  • RESULTS: Frank Darras and his firms have recovered nearly a $1 billion dollars in wrongfully denied insurance benefits to date, and we put that proven track record to work for you and your family.

DarrasLaw is Americas' most honored and decorated disability litigation firm in the country. Mr. Darras has seen more, evaluated more, litigated more, and resolved more individual and group long term disability and long-term care cases than any other lawyer in the United States.

Request a Free, Confidential Case Review.
Skip to content