The case involves a client who worked as a telecommunications manager at a large hospital system. She suffered from arthritis and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, a progressive neurological disorder causing pain, fatigue, and muscle loss, which was exacerbated by a fall.
Her disability claim with Prudential was initially approved, and she received benefits for four months (after a three-month elimination period). However, Prudential then suddenly denied her claim, stating nothing had changed medically.
Prudential’s denial was based on a “paper review” by an occupational medicine doctor who did not examine the client but concluded she could perform her job, which the doctor incorrectly classified as sedentary. The attorneys criticize insurance companies for using such doctors and paper reviews, arguing these doctors often serve to deny claims and medical records are intended for patient treatment, not to prove disability to reviewers.
To appeal the denial, attorney Alex Palamara and his team built a strong case by:
By submitting this comprehensive evidence package that exposed the flaws in Prudential’s denial, they successfully convinced Prudential to reverse the decision and reinstate the client’s benefits within just four weeks. The attorneys emphasize the importance of a thorough appeal process for ERISA-governed disability claims.